Intel Core i3-6100
intel
Brand2
Cores4
Threads51 W
TDP14 nm
Process Size3.7 GH/z
Base ClockDDR4
Memory Supportintel socket 1151
SocketIntel Core i3-6100
Techinical Specs
Processor Details
Name
Intel Core i3-6100
Brand
intel
Process Type
desktop
Release Date
Aug 31st 2015
Launch Price
$
Specifications
Socket
intel socket 1151
Foundry
Intel
Process Size
14 nm
Die Size
150 mm 2
Package
Performance
Frequency
3.7 GH/z
Multiplier
37.0 x
Multiplier Unlocked
YES
TDP
51 W
Core Configuration
Total Cores
2
Total Threads
4
Hybrid Cores
N/A
Integrated GPU
Intel HD 530
Cache
L1: 64 KB
L2: 0.25 MB
L3: 4.00 MB
Architecture
Codename
Skylake
Generation
Core i3 (Skylake)
Memory Support
DDR4
ECC Memory Support
YES
PCI Express
Gen 3, 16 Lanes(CPU only)
Supported Chipsets
Features
- • MMX
- • SSE
- • SSE2
- • SSE3
- • SSSE3
- • SSE4.1
- • SSE4.2
- • AVX
- • AVX2
- • EIST
- • Intel 64
- • XD bit
- • VT-x
- • HTT
- • AES-NI
- • TSX
- • CLMUL
- • FMA3
Most Compared CPUs
Based on actual user comparison data
Intel Core i3-7100
2017
3.9 GHz
2/4
51W
$
Intel Core i5-3570
2012
3.4 GHz
4/4
77W
194$
Intel Core i5-2500
2011
3.3 GHz
4/4
95W
$
Intel Core i5-2400
2011
3.1 GHz
4/4
95W
$
Intel Core i3-4170
2014
3.7 GHz
2/4
54W
117$
Performance in Benchmarks
Cinebench R23
PassMark
Geekbench 5
Blender
Performance in Games
Need for Speed Payback
STAR WARS Battlefront II
Unravel Two
Destiny 2
ReCore: Definitive Edition
Yakuza 0
No more benchmarks available for this CPU
Performance Review Summary
Generating AI Review...
Intel Core i3-6100
Processor
$
PCBench Rating in 2025
Based on comprehensive benchmarks and real-world performance data analyzed by our custom AI algorithm.
AI Summary
The Intel Core i3-6100 is a 2015-era dual-core, four-thread desktop processor built on 14nm technology. With a Passmark score of 4146 and average gaming performance around 60–150 FPS at 1080p in older titles like Frostpunk and STAR WARS Battlefront II, it's severely outdated for modern gaming and multitasking. Its lack of price data and weak multi-threaded performance makes it a poor choice today, even when compared to budget modern CPUs like the AMD Ryzen 5 8400F.
Pros
- Low 51W TDP suggests modest power consumption for its time
- Integrated Intel HD 530 GPU allows basic display output without a discrete graphics card
- Achieves playable framerates in some 1080p ultra titles like Yakuza 0 and Frostpunk
- Hyper-Threading helps multitasking and older application performance for a dual-core CPU
Cons
- Severely outdated architecture from 2015, lacking modern instruction sets and efficiency
- Only 2 cores and 4 threads, insufficient for modern gaming and multitasking
- No official price listed, but offers far worse value than current-gen budget CPUs
- Gaming performance is inconsistent, struggling in modern titles despite decent results in lighter games
Most Compared CPUs
Comments & Discussion
Share your thoughts and experiences